summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/chapter4.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-23 11:32:32 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-23 11:33:22 +0100
commit3fc34d77cb0354808fe3efae969a065adf14e849 (patch)
treef72a48fa7c45cf0ead69428cc827ba0780b9657c /chapter4.md
parent1d4bd63cf9d1397b96231fd7c41d224c09518095 (diff)
parent6c2afa67f73e4aa506b211b5d68e85821142baee (diff)
Merge branch 'main' of https://git.joeac.net/joeac/msc-dissertation-aug-2026
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter4.md')
-rw-r--r--chapter4.md11
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/chapter4.md b/chapter4.md
index 8fb1efa..d6c0431 100644
--- a/chapter4.md
+++ b/chapter4.md
@@ -1,10 +1,13 @@
## Chapter 4
In the previous three chapters, I've explored how and why contemporary green
-rhetoric is too often failing, and argued that the apocalyptic form is not one
-of the root causes. In this chapter, I aim to show that in order for green
-rhetoric to succeed, it must imitate some of the rhetorical strategies of the
-Apocalypse.
+rhetoric is too often failing, and discussed the particular criticism of the use
+of catastrophic language. In the previous chapter, I argued that these
+criticisms of catastrophic language do not apply to the use of apocalyptic
+language in the most important model of apocalyptic rhetoric in Western
+literature, namely, the Apocalypse of St John. Now, in this chapter, I aim to
+show that in order for green rhetoric to succeed, it should imitate the
+apocalyptic rhetorical strategies of the Apocalypse discussed in the previous chapter.
In order to consider how green rhetoric might succeed, I have to specify: what
is the rhetor trying to achieve? How are they hoping that it will be achieved?