diff options
| author | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-07-20 17:32:52 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-07-20 17:32:52 +0100 |
| commit | 6c2afa67f73e4aa506b211b5d68e85821142baee (patch) | |
| tree | b6e593cb5765278fbf9ce3ed8589544c8cfbbb04 /chapter4.md | |
| parent | 6c0e0e21203d604d9e3cbfdd59df924894eb2bab (diff) | |
chp4: improve signposting at beginning
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter4.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | chapter4.md | 11 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/chapter4.md b/chapter4.md index 8fb1efa..d6c0431 100644 --- a/chapter4.md +++ b/chapter4.md @@ -1,10 +1,13 @@ ## Chapter 4 In the previous three chapters, I've explored how and why contemporary green -rhetoric is too often failing, and argued that the apocalyptic form is not one -of the root causes. In this chapter, I aim to show that in order for green -rhetoric to succeed, it must imitate some of the rhetorical strategies of the -Apocalypse. +rhetoric is too often failing, and discussed the particular criticism of the use +of catastrophic language. In the previous chapter, I argued that these +criticisms of catastrophic language do not apply to the use of apocalyptic +language in the most important model of apocalyptic rhetoric in Western +literature, namely, the Apocalypse of St John. Now, in this chapter, I aim to +show that in order for green rhetoric to succeed, it should imitate the +apocalyptic rhetorical strategies of the Apocalypse discussed in the previous chapter. In order to consider how green rhetoric might succeed, I have to specify: what is the rhetor trying to achieve? How are they hoping that it will be achieved? |
