diff options
| author | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-08-04 13:47:23 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-08-04 13:47:23 +0100 |
| commit | c0bd49166ff53f06638c0e4aae214432c4b56468 (patch) | |
| tree | 5de0505d894ae99ac0f8803b027417dc1abda188 /chapter3.md | |
| parent | 1b02a4bcaccfdae3d7ae78af9aab7eb239c5be7f (diff) | |
link chp1 and chp2
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter3.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | chapter3.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/chapter3.md b/chapter3.md index 8a81e2d..c6cbb9f 100644 --- a/chapter3.md +++ b/chapter3.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ In the previous chapter, I explored how contemporary green rhetors use catastrophic language, and three reasons why some commentators believe -that this is counter-productive. Given the close relationship between +that this causes rhetors to get the fundamentals of successful rhetoric wrong. Given the close relationship between catastrophe and apocalypse in the imaginations of many people in the West, this begs the question of whether green rhetors ought also to avoid apocalyptic language. Frances Flannery, Professor Emerita of Religion at James Madison |