summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/chapter0.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-06-02 17:17:17 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-06-02 17:17:17 +0100
commitb6eb493ab0281b01b370935c038ab25d18e5448a (patch)
treed80f7bbafdf229672a050505e40fd61c5e93ddb2 /chapter0.md
parent6275b8a4e33dcb2494fb693b0d7fab68afaeb952 (diff)
introduction: add final signposting para
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter0.md')
-rw-r--r--chapter0.md12
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/chapter0.md b/chapter0.md
index ae77c62..e97fafc 100644
--- a/chapter0.md
+++ b/chapter0.md
@@ -71,4 +71,14 @@ professional middle-class Western political movement which emerged in the 1960s
to protect 'nature' against the encroachment of 'civilisation', and which has
now adopted climate change as a 'master frame' for its issues.
-In this rest of this dissertation, I will \[TODO\]
+In recent decades, many of the most important political demands of the green
+movement have not been realised, and many scholars have supposed that green
+rhetoric is not fulfilling its proper function of delivering change. In this
+rest of this dissertation, I will first explore why it might be that green
+rhetoric is failing to deliver political change, before exploring in more detail
+one particular allegation: green rhetoric isn't working because it is too
+apocalyptic. I will argue that this diagnosis is unhelpful and untrue. In
+contrast, I will argue not only that green rhetors must continue to use
+apocalyptic end-of-the-world language, but that they must draw deeper on other
+aspects of apocalyptic language which have been heretofore neglected by green
+rhetors, if they are to play their proper part in delivering political change.