summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-07 11:32:38 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-07 11:32:38 +0100
commitebfac9dc803dbb5cd8d508214a6f1aaf5d36f296 (patch)
tree0bfacc2754a7f1b2cc701b10368fca45e94cc5b5
parent8fd6e0bf3511479caa59d6e2c9532a913ae13c8f (diff)
chp0 todos
-rw-r--r--chapter0.md11
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/chapter0.md b/chapter0.md
index 0f9bf03..a129002 100644
--- a/chapter0.md
+++ b/chapter0.md
@@ -80,3 +80,14 @@ contrast, I will argue not only that green rhetors must continue to use
apocalyptic end-of-the-world language, but that they must draw deeper on other
aspects of apocalyptic language which have been heretofore neglected by green
rhetors, if they are to play their proper part in delivering political change.
+
+## TODO
+
+- Evidence: environmental movement attracted middle-class members in the 1960s
+- Evidence: Silent Spring was significant in bringing about change
+- Evidence: environmental legislation was passed after Silent Spring
+- Evidence: nuclear was once the master frame for the environmental movement
+- Evidence: governments misled their citizens on nuclear war
+- Evidence: anti-nuclear campaigners attacked government misinformation
+- Evidence: anti-nuclear (apocalyptic) language
+- Evidence: climate change is now the environmental movement's master frame