diff options
| author | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-07-06 18:14:30 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-07-06 18:14:30 +0100 |
| commit | 8fd6e0bf3511479caa59d6e2c9532a913ae13c8f (patch) | |
| tree | 6e782f78aa85a6eef4180cb70b8eb08f579ed33d | |
| parent | 375386b63166e31a543c1b3b3c1ef7a799def4d0 (diff) | |
log: bowman 2010
| -rw-r--r-- | bibliography.bib | 12 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | log.md | 24 |
2 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/bibliography.bib b/bibliography.bib index 3d83c42..48381d3 100644 --- a/bibliography.bib +++ b/bibliography.bib @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +@inbook{bowman-2010, + author={Bowman, Andrew}, + title={Are We Armed Only with Peer-Reviewed Science?}, + subtitle={The Scientization of Politics in the Radical Environmental Movement}, + date={2010}, + editor={Skrimshire, Stefan}, + publisher={Continuum}, + address={London}, + booktitle={Future Ethics}, + booksubtitle={Climate Change and Apocalyptic Imagination}, +} + @book{novel-climate-change, author={Trexler, Adam}, address={Charlottesville}, @@ -6,6 +6,30 @@ author: Joe Carstairs ## 2026-07-06 +### @{bowman-2010} + +Andrew Bowman shows how the scientisation of environmental politics has +deliberately closed down political vision and radical alternatives. +Environmentalists have explicitly rejected comparisons to social movements like +feminism, civil rights, and nuclear disarmament, because, they claim, their +movement is based on facts and not ideals. George Monbiot says that anti-system +radicals are putting politics first and facts second. Would a 2C world at the +cost of denying the global poor access to energy be worth it? And how is a 2C +world to be achieved anyway without politics, even as some environmentalists say +that democracy is an obstacle to environmental action? They seem to promote the +idea that power should be left in the hands of a qualified technocratic +minority, and the role of protest is to remind them to be more technocratic. +Thus protests at RBS for their fossil fuel investment, or at military air bases +for their fuel-inefficient touch-and-go runs. + +This gives me an idea. + +- @{novel-climate-change}: climate speculation is out, climate realism is in +- @{green-utopias}: the end of nature motif banishes formal eco-topia +- @{bowman-2010}: scientism banishes political vision +- MY ORIGINAL ARGUMENT: scientism is the principal obstacle, utopianism + obvious in successful 20C social movements, should be imitated today + ### @{novel-climate-change} A broad discussion of climate change in recent novels. I was looking for |
