summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-06 18:14:30 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-06 18:14:30 +0100
commit8fd6e0bf3511479caa59d6e2c9532a913ae13c8f (patch)
tree6e782f78aa85a6eef4180cb70b8eb08f579ed33d
parent375386b63166e31a543c1b3b3c1ef7a799def4d0 (diff)
log: bowman 2010
-rw-r--r--bibliography.bib12
-rw-r--r--log.md24
2 files changed, 36 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/bibliography.bib b/bibliography.bib
index 3d83c42..48381d3 100644
--- a/bibliography.bib
+++ b/bibliography.bib
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+@inbook{bowman-2010,
+ author={Bowman, Andrew},
+ title={Are We Armed Only with Peer-Reviewed Science?},
+ subtitle={The Scientization of Politics in the Radical Environmental Movement},
+ date={2010},
+ editor={Skrimshire, Stefan},
+ publisher={Continuum},
+ address={London},
+ booktitle={Future Ethics},
+ booksubtitle={Climate Change and Apocalyptic Imagination},
+}
+
@book{novel-climate-change,
author={Trexler, Adam},
address={Charlottesville},
diff --git a/log.md b/log.md
index 71ad3fb..736bf3b 100644
--- a/log.md
+++ b/log.md
@@ -6,6 +6,30 @@ author: Joe Carstairs
## 2026-07-06
+### @{bowman-2010}
+
+Andrew Bowman shows how the scientisation of environmental politics has
+deliberately closed down political vision and radical alternatives.
+Environmentalists have explicitly rejected comparisons to social movements like
+feminism, civil rights, and nuclear disarmament, because, they claim, their
+movement is based on facts and not ideals. George Monbiot says that anti-system
+radicals are putting politics first and facts second. Would a 2C world at the
+cost of denying the global poor access to energy be worth it? And how is a 2C
+world to be achieved anyway without politics, even as some environmentalists say
+that democracy is an obstacle to environmental action? They seem to promote the
+idea that power should be left in the hands of a qualified technocratic
+minority, and the role of protest is to remind them to be more technocratic.
+Thus protests at RBS for their fossil fuel investment, or at military air bases
+for their fuel-inefficient touch-and-go runs.
+
+This gives me an idea.
+
+- @{novel-climate-change}: climate speculation is out, climate realism is in
+- @{green-utopias}: the end of nature motif banishes formal eco-topia
+- @{bowman-2010}: scientism banishes political vision
+- MY ORIGINAL ARGUMENT: scientism is the principal obstacle, utopianism
+ obvious in successful 20C social movements, should be imitated today
+
### @{novel-climate-change}
A broad discussion of climate change in recent novels. I was looking for