summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-08-04 14:08:01 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-08-04 14:08:01 +0100
commitc4ac2402df5d03b9c11e0793522fccd7507158f0 (patch)
tree069d1277b6286d023749c25d9d6ee67a22f4a237
parent455265016b5825a9a15656254af77ccc35a28621 (diff)
chp3: more sympathetic phrasing of effect of john's genre
-rw-r--r--chapter3.md6
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/chapter3.md b/chapter3.md
index 98b6c2a..4386d67 100644
--- a/chapter3.md
+++ b/chapter3.md
@@ -216,9 +216,9 @@ of majority epistemic norms tearing them from their roots in their minority
community. As a result, early Christians would have needed to develop defensive
strategies if their minority cognition were to survive.
-By adopting the form of an apocalyptic prophecy, and, no less, an apocalypse of
-Jesus Christ, John claims authority no Greek authority can challenge (for a
-member of the Christian minority). In the course of his apocalypse, he also
+Because John adopted the form of an apocalyptic prophecy, and, no less, an apocalypse of
+Jesus Christ, an Asian Christian receiving his message would have been empowered to hold
+their own against majority cognition. In the course of his apocalypse, John also
subtly undermines majority epistemology. As already explored, he mocks top Greek
gods such as Apollo and Artemis. He also highlights the material benefits on
offer for the rich to collude with Babylon (Rev 18), and highlights the power of