diff options
| author | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-08-04 14:11:09 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-08-04 14:11:09 +0100 |
| commit | 33848b4659820abed3dea5d104415a5b8a7cf4c9 (patch) | |
| tree | 22fbc2b022d225f46848a50d8696766069c1f057 | |
| parent | 89dca3cba5c839d438d4331cbc803169bc589e0a (diff) | |
chp4: green transition -> transition
| -rw-r--r-- | chapter4.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/chapter4.md b/chapter4.md index 129e441..5769178 100644 --- a/chapter4.md +++ b/chapter4.md @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ political actions to advance the causes of the green movement? First of all, catastrophism ought to be deployed in a way which exposes the evil of present systems and leaves open the possibility of resistance. Nicholas Beuret uses catastrophic language to expose the falsity, as he sees it, of -'climate transition' rhetoric, and motivate his audience to 'disrupt' that green +'climate transition' rhetoric, and motivate his audience to 'disrupt' that transition: > The impacts \[of climate change\] will be terrible. Already at somewhere |
