From 33848b4659820abed3dea5d104415a5b8a7cf4c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joe Carstairs Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 14:11:09 +0100 Subject: chp4: green transition -> transition --- chapter4.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/chapter4.md b/chapter4.md index 129e441..5769178 100644 --- a/chapter4.md +++ b/chapter4.md @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ political actions to advance the causes of the green movement? First of all, catastrophism ought to be deployed in a way which exposes the evil of present systems and leaves open the possibility of resistance. Nicholas Beuret uses catastrophic language to expose the falsity, as he sees it, of -'climate transition' rhetoric, and motivate his audience to 'disrupt' that green +'climate transition' rhetoric, and motivate his audience to 'disrupt' that transition: > The impacts \[of climate change\] will be terrible. Already at somewhere -- cgit v1.2.3