summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/chapter3.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter3.md')
-rw-r--r--chapter3.md4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/chapter3.md b/chapter3.md
index 13dfc63..00d6f7a 100644
--- a/chapter3.md
+++ b/chapter3.md
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ catastrophe is the dominant effective symbol associated with apocalyptic
language.
In what remains of this chapter, I will argue that in the case of the Apocalypse
-of St John, by far the dominant model of apocalyptic literature in the
+of John, by far the dominant model of apocalyptic literature in the
post-Christendom West, these criticisms do not cut. For John and his historical
audience, John's visions of catastrophe were essential to his critique of the
Roman Empire. In contrast to the accusations of fatalism, conservatism and
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ creation, while the nations of the earth flood in to worship and to receive life
and healing. 'It is an ethic for martyrdom,' as John J. Collins, a leading
scholar on biblical apocalyptic, puts it [@apocalyptic-imagination, chp. 9].
-St John's rhetoric therefore is against fatalism: he motivates and calls his
+John's rhetoric therefore is against fatalism: he motivates and calls his
audience to meaningful political action. It is against conservatism: he asks his
audience to subvert dominant power structures and build a radical alternative
society and value system. It is ardently political: his rhetoric is rooted in a