summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--bibliography.bib17
-rw-r--r--chapter1.md10
2 files changed, 23 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/bibliography.bib b/bibliography.bib
index 32917f0..5f6f478 100644
--- a/bibliography.bib
+++ b/bibliography.bib
@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
+@book{population-bomb,
+ author={Erlich, Paul Ralph},
+ title={The Population Bomb},
+ address={New York},
+ publisher={Ballantyne Books},
+ date={1968},
+}
+
+@book{small-is-beautiful,
+ author={Schumacher, Ernst Friedrich},
+ title={Small Is Beautiful},
+ subtitle={a study of economics as if people mattered},
+ publisher={Blond & Briggs},
+ date={1973},
+ address={London},
+}
+
@report{financial-lives-2024,
title={Financial Lives 2024 survey},
date={2025-05-16},
diff --git a/chapter1.md b/chapter1.md
index b0817fa..3609d0b 100644
--- a/chapter1.md
+++ b/chapter1.md
@@ -193,10 +193,12 @@ footprint calculator, which had previously been an obscure concept.
Having mis-diagnosed the root causes of the problem, green rhetors too often go
on to propose incredible solutions. The worst is simply to cut consumption.
Since _The Limits to Growth_ was published for the Club of Rome in 1972
-[@limits-to-growth], the green movement has frequently emphasised a message of
-austerity or 'de-growth,' echoing the austerity rhetoric which dominated the
-cost-of-living discourse in the 1970s and since that time
-[@climate-change-class-war, pp. 158-159].
+[@limits-to-growth], bolstered by eco-classics such as _Small Is Beautiful_
+(1973) [@small-is-beautiful] and _The Population Bomb_ (1968) [@population-bomb]
+the green movement has frequently emphasised a message of austerity or
+'de-growth,' echoing the austerity rhetoric which dominated the cost-of-living
+discourse in the 1970s and since that time [@climate-change-class-war, pp.
+158-159].
So, in 2006, George Monbiot set out his manifesto for putting the UK through a
90% cut in greenhouse gas emissions. While Monbiot acknowledged that austerity