summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tasks.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-05-11 14:35:06 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-05-11 14:35:06 +0100
commitf7f16deea33f476c3cf71d23df507323fa3f11b3 (patch)
tree7936f4ef6163769d5aecbe7804b839c89e7eea54 /tasks.md
parent3461d8f9efaa23cfe2df48a74e8f49f5fa921b3b (diff)
tasks: update for new structure
Diffstat (limited to 'tasks.md')
-rw-r--r--tasks.md97
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 60 deletions
diff --git a/tasks.md b/tasks.md
index 82602a1..db43e69 100644
--- a/tasks.md
+++ b/tasks.md
@@ -1,82 +1,59 @@
# Tasks
-## Week 1-3 (end: Fri 1 May)
+## Week 1-4 (end: Fri 8 May)
- [x] Exploratory reading
- [x] Re-draft the dissertation argument and structure
- [x] Re-draft the project plan
-## Week 4 (end: Fri 8 May)
-
-- [x] Gather a list of 'core apocalyptic forms'
-- [x] Gather examples of green rhetoric using 'core apocalyptic forms'
-- [x] Gather examples of green rhetoric in which the catastrophe is final
-- [x] Gather examples of green rhetoric in which the audience is blamed or
- assumed to have power over the problem
-- [x] Gather evidence that catastrophic green rhetoric causes alienation
-- [ ] Gather evidence that catastrophic green rhetoric obstructs appropriate
- responses to ongoing green harms
-- [x] Gather evidence that catastrophic green rhetoric blames the wrong people,
- i.e. evidence that major green harms are not fairly blamed on the
- behaviour of ordinary people
-- [ ] Gather evidence that catastrophic green rhetoric justifies violence and
- authoritarianism
-
-## Week 5 (end: Fri 15 May)
-
-- [ ] Gather evidence that St John's rhetorical strategy is to exhort his
- audience to a martyrdom ethic through an immanent catastrophe
-- [ ] Gather examples of St John using the 'core apocalyptic forms'
-- [ ] Gather examples of St John using the particular apocalyptic features his
- rhetorical strategy requires
-- [ ] Gather examples of ancient apocalypse using the features I think are
- under-exploited by apocalyptic green rhetoric
-- [ ] Gather examples of apocalyptic green rhetoric using martyrdom-apocalyptic
- features
-- [ ] Gather evidence that martyrdom-apocalyptic green rhetoric banishes panic
-- [ ] Gather evidence that martyrdom-apocalyptic green rhetoric encourages local
- action
-- [ ] Gather evidence that martyrdom-apocalyptic green rhetoric awakens the
- complacent
-- [ ] Gather evidence that martyrdom-apocalyptic green rhetoric encourages
- resistance to dominant systems
-- [ ] Gather evidence that green rhetoric can use the features I think are
- under-exploited by apocalyptic green rhetoric to make good things happen
-
-## Week 6 (end: Fri 5 Jun)
+## Week 5-6 (end: Fri 5 Jun)
-- [ ] Draft chapter 2
+- [ ] Draft chapter 1
-## Week 7 (end: Fri 12 Jun)
+Thesis: contemporary green rhetoric is a failure because it mis-diagnoses the
+root causes of the problems, fails to identify credible routes to credible
+solutions, and fails to identify an appropriate audience.
-- [ ] Draft chapter 3
+1. Contemporary green rhetoric (R) is a failure
+2. R mis-diagnoses the problem
+3. R fails to identify credible routes to credible solutions
+4. R fails to identify an audience that can be persuaded to make a difference
+5. The material results of R have been dismal
+
+## Week 7-8 (end: Fri 19 Jun)
+
+- [ ] Draft chapter 2
-## Week 8 (end: Fri 19 Jun)
+Thesis: anti-apocalyptic criticism of R mis-diagnoses the problem.
-- [ ] Draft introduction
+6. The effect on R's audience now is a spiralling cycle of despair
+7. This has led some critics to blame apocalypticism for the failure of R
+8. This is a traditional criticism of apocalypticism 'from above'
+9. Apocalypse 'from below' has often worked very differently
+10. This difference is due to the different interests of the readers -- a
+ difference which does not apply in the case of green crises
+11. In fact, apocalypse can meet the critic's concerns in principle
+12. (In order to do so in practice, those with power need to attack the
+ structures which drive the downward spiral)
-## Week 9 (end: Fri 26 Jun)
+## Week 9-10 (end: Fri 3 Jul)
-- [ ] Draft summary
+- [ ] Draft chapter 3
-## Week 10 (end: Fri 3 Jul)
+Thesis: green rhetors need to use apocalyptic rhetoric in order to motivate
+their PMC audiences to a martyrdom ethic.
-- [ ] Re-draft chapter 2
+13. John's rhetoric exhorts his audience to a martyrdom ethic
+14. R needs to exhort their audiences to a martyrdom ethic
+15. Socialist rhetoric in the past has used apocalypticism for this very purpose
+16. Once rhetors addressing the PMC have fixed all the other problems with R,
+ they'll need this apocalyptic hope, too
## Week 11 (end: Fri 23 Jul)
-- [ ] Re-draft chapter 3
+- [ ] Write introduction and conclusion
+- [ ] Start re-drafting
## Week 12 (end: Fri 30 Jul)
-- [ ] Re-draft introduction and conclusion
-
-## Bonus
-
-- [ ] Gather a list of shared forms between nuclear rhetoric and green rhetoric
-- [ ] Gather examples of catastrophic nuclear rhetoric
-- [ ] Gather examples of catastrophic green rhetoric demonstrating the close
- link with nuclear rhetoric, many of which should be from the same time
- period as the peak of nuclear catastrophe rhetoric
-- [ ] Incorporate into the dissertation an argument that catastrophic green
- rhetoric has a strong genetic relationship with nuclear rhetoric
+- [ ] Final re-draft