link chp1 and chp2

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/chapter5.md b/chapter5.md
index cae25a4..26d28ba 100644
--- a/chapter5.md
+++ b/chapter5.md
@@ -11,10 +11,11 @@ doesn't match the interests and powers of their real audiences, namely,
 the Western middle classes. As a result, they end up proposing solutions that
 aren't feasible.
 
-How could green rhetors be more effective? One common suggestion, explored in
+Why are green rhetors failing on the fundamentals? One common suggestion, explored in
 chapter 2, is that green rhetors should avoid the motif of catastrophe, or, in a
 certain sense, 'apocalypse.' Catastrophic rhetoric has been accused of creating
-resignation, despair, apathy, and dismissal, and of killing genuine politics.
+resignation, despair, apathy, and dismissal, and of killing genuine politics,
+driving the fundamental problems discussed in chapter 1.
 This line of thought, together with the fact that 'apocalypse' is treated as a
 catastrophic symbol in popular culture, leads Frances Flannery to suggest that
 green rhetors should avoid evoking apocalyptic associations.