summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/chapter3.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-20 16:33:10 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-20 16:33:10 +0100
commitfee4cab5b993c975952bb606469c02edc07a7451 (patch)
treeb658696057552966d2c2acbf75de969fb58d8be9 /chapter3.md
parentdd79fa1de46f904894461c95c44d65aedc808349 (diff)
chp3: expand why genuine vision inadequate to explain apocalyptic genre with example
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter3.md')
-rw-r--r--chapter3.md9
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/chapter3.md b/chapter3.md
index f2ac525..c5a9af6 100644
--- a/chapter3.md
+++ b/chapter3.md
@@ -221,9 +221,12 @@ intermediary, and is thus regarded by scholars as a marker of the genre,
Why might John have used this genre? While it is perfectly plausible that John
had a genuine visionary experience [@visions-in-apocalyptic-handbook, pp.
-115-116], this would still not explain why he chose to publish an account of his
-experience using the apocalyptic genre. One reason may be that John inhabited,
-as Leonard Thompson described it, a 'cognitive minority' [@thompson-revelation].
+115-116], this would still not explain why he chose to publish an account of
+his experience using the apocalyptic genre. If a typical Western middle-class
+person were to have a visionary experience today, they might choose to find a
+more scientifically respectable framing before sharing their insights with
+others. One reason that John used the apocalyptic genre may be that John
+inhabited, as Leonard Thompson described it, a 'cognitive minority' [@thompson-revelation].
Early Christian communities led distinctive lives on the basis of exclusive
sources of knowledge: apostolic authority, prophecy, eyewitness testimony,