diff options
| author | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-07-20 16:33:10 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-07-20 16:33:10 +0100 |
| commit | fee4cab5b993c975952bb606469c02edc07a7451 (patch) | |
| tree | b658696057552966d2c2acbf75de969fb58d8be9 /chapter3.md | |
| parent | dd79fa1de46f904894461c95c44d65aedc808349 (diff) | |
chp3: expand why genuine vision inadequate to explain apocalyptic genre with example
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter3.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | chapter3.md | 9 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/chapter3.md b/chapter3.md index f2ac525..c5a9af6 100644 --- a/chapter3.md +++ b/chapter3.md @@ -221,9 +221,12 @@ intermediary, and is thus regarded by scholars as a marker of the genre, Why might John have used this genre? While it is perfectly plausible that John had a genuine visionary experience [@visions-in-apocalyptic-handbook, pp. -115-116], this would still not explain why he chose to publish an account of his -experience using the apocalyptic genre. One reason may be that John inhabited, -as Leonard Thompson described it, a 'cognitive minority' [@thompson-revelation]. +115-116], this would still not explain why he chose to publish an account of +his experience using the apocalyptic genre. If a typical Western middle-class +person were to have a visionary experience today, they might choose to find a +more scientifically respectable framing before sharing their insights with +others. One reason that John used the apocalyptic genre may be that John +inhabited, as Leonard Thompson described it, a 'cognitive minority' [@thompson-revelation]. Early Christian communities led distinctive lives on the basis of exclusive sources of knowledge: apostolic authority, prophecy, eyewitness testimony, |
