summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/chapter3.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-06-01 08:47:14 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-06-01 08:47:14 +0100
commitf5d0f2e78fa2ba865499db9c6e0aa2a5359761bd (patch)
treea7ca705d4ba189e201ad9bfca9cf6c0cf055f1cd /chapter3.md
parent76948c5cabf2c92ab2f9fd3c75276b632e62556c (diff)
minor rewording in chp3 (from 2026-05-03)
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter3.md')
-rw-r--r--chapter3.md4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/chapter3.md b/chapter3.md
index 6cee85e..18eb62b 100644
--- a/chapter3.md
+++ b/chapter3.md
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ their PMC audiences to a martyrdom ethic.
In the previous two chapters, I've explored how and why contemporary green
rhetoric is too often failing, and argued that the apocalyptic form is not one
-of the root causes. In this chapter, I aim to show that green rhetoric needs
-apocalypse in order to succeed.
+of the root causes. In this chapter, I aim to show that when green rhetoric
+succeeds, it draws much deeper on apocalypse than catastrophic narratives do.
The Apocalypse of St John is written from below and primarily written to readers
reading from below. He places their struggles in a larger context: of a cosmic