summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/chapter2.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-29 11:52:44 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-29 11:52:44 +0100
commit38aa5c7bd82dd1343bd97be16d8c2a0e5e4e1265 (patch)
tree91db21704f381d3396a935153ad02e2ef22d915e /chapter2.md
parentd4bfe25af7cc4f0e6893b95e1fec03b67398422c (diff)
chp2: nuclear catastrophe
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter2.md')
-rw-r--r--chapter2.md11
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/chapter2.md b/chapter2.md
index adb458a..4989e32 100644
--- a/chapter2.md
+++ b/chapter2.md
@@ -20,7 +20,15 @@ divided by sudden cataclysmic events. [@oed-catastrophe]
Anti-nuclear campaigners used the word 'catastrophe' to describe the effects of
a nuclear war, echoing this model of geological time, suggesting that a nuclear
war would have such severe, irreversible consequences that it would represent
-the next great cataclysm in geological time \[EVIDENCE\].
+the next great cataclysm in geological time. In 1964, Tom Stonier wrote that
+'even in a century marked by two "total" wars the totality of the catastrophe we
+face in the threat of thermonuclear war is barely imaginable'
+[@nuclear-disaster, p. 17], before going on to imagine just that, predicting not
+only massive death from shockwaves, firestorms and fallout, but also stark
+ecological imbalances leading to insect plagues, total destruction of plant life
+and soils in many places, and sudden collapses of existing glaciers followed by
+extremely cold weather which 'might initiate another ice age'
+[@nuclear-disaster, p. 136].
Whether or not green rhetors explicitly use the word 'catastrophe,' they often
imply a catastrophic model of the problems they present. When Extinction
@@ -253,6 +261,5 @@ desired outcomes.
## TODO
-- Explore and evidence: anti-nuclear rhetors echoed geological catastrophism
- Find quotes & page numbers in @{cry-of-the-wild}, @{no-one-is-too-small}
- Explore and evidence: death of politics idea