chp1: cite heat

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/chapter1.md b/chapter1.md
index 9712512..53f30e7 100644
--- a/chapter1.md
+++ b/chapter1.md
@@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ rhetoric was a hard sell, repent did he not:
 > is worth fighting. Failing that, I have one last hope: that I might make
 > people so depressed about the state of the planet that they stay in bed all
 > day, thereby reducing their consumption of fossil fuels.
-> [@heat, p. \[WHICH?\]]
+> [@heat, p. xxix]
 
 More appealing still, Monbiot suggests cutting yourselves off from your loved
 ones to save the climate:
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ ones to save the climate:
 > Perhaps the most intractable cause of global warming is ‘love miles’: the
 > distance you must travel to visit friends and partners and relatives on the
 > other side of the planet. The world could be destroyed by love.
-> [@heat, p. \[WHICH?\]]
+> [@heat, p. 22]
 
 Two fans, Sharon Astyk and Miranda Edel, inspired by the book, set out in 2007
 to reduce their household consumption to 10% of the US average. In response to
@@ -564,7 +564,3 @@ I'll argue that green rhetors today must use John's rhetorical techniques in ord
 to make change happen. But first, in the following chapter, I'll explore how
 catastrophism appears in contemporary green rhetoric, and why critics allege that
 catastrophic language is counter-productive in this context.
-
-## TODO
-
-- Find quotes and page numbers in @{heat}