chp1: reword summary

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/chapter1.md b/chapter1.md
index 1c64240..5854d97 100644
--- a/chapter1.md
+++ b/chapter1.md
@@ -409,8 +409,7 @@ interests for such exhortations to be feasible.
 
 This begs the question: if green rhetoric is failing, how might it be fixed? One
 common suggestion is that green rhetoric needs to be less catastrophic. Since
-apocalyptic language is often assumed to be more or less equivalent to
-catastrophic language, it is easy for commentators such as Frances Flannery to
+apocalyptic language is often reduced to a catastrophic symbol, it is easy to
 infer that successful green rhetoric should avoid apocalyptic language. In
 chapter 3, I'll argue that such a conclusion ignores the possibilities of
 apocalyptic language, including, and going well beyond, its catastrophic