diff options
| author | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-08-04 12:53:29 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-08-04 12:53:29 +0100 |
| commit | f6a6e14ff6218e730e471959b8436f2ebd0a0c1c (patch) | |
| tree | 8e78dd1366fb09b985f2fad33eccf5f9e9b30566 /chapter0.md | |
| parent | 0e914dfee88bddae7eef941fd7f5752829409a36 (diff) | |
mention John in chp0 summary
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter0.md')
| -rw-r--r-- | chapter0.md | 5 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/chapter0.md b/chapter0.md index 54ef7ad..1f37888 100644 --- a/chapter0.md +++ b/chapter0.md @@ -82,5 +82,6 @@ rhetoric is failing to deliver political change, before exploring in more detail one particular allegation: green rhetoric is too catastrophic, or, in the terms of some critics, 'apocalyptic.' In contrast, I will argue not only that green rhetors must continue to use catastrophic language, but they must also draw -deeper on other aspects of apocalyptic language which have been heretofore -neglected, if green rhetors are to play their part in delivering change. +deeper on other aspects of apocalyptic language as modelled by John of the +Apocalypse which have been heretofore neglected, if green rhetors are to play +their part in delivering change. |