link chp1 and chp2

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/chapter0.md b/chapter0.md
index 1f37888..6439865 100644
--- a/chapter0.md
+++ b/chapter0.md
@@ -77,9 +77,9 @@ This is where green rhetoric stands today. In recent decades, many of the most
 important political demands of the green movement have not been realised.
 Green rhetoric is not delivering change.
 
-In the chapters which follow, I will first explore why it might be that green
-rhetoric is failing to deliver political change, before exploring in more detail
-one particular allegation: green rhetoric is too catastrophic, or, in the terms
+In the chapters which follow, I will first explore how green rhetors often get
+the fundamentals of successful rhetoric wrong, before exploring in more detail
+one proposed explanation for this: green rhetoric is too catastrophic, or, in the terms
 of some critics, 'apocalyptic.' In contrast, I will argue not only that green
 rhetors must continue to use catastrophic language, but they must also draw
 deeper on other aspects of apocalyptic language as modelled by John of the