summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-06-10 17:05:14 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-06-10 17:05:14 +0100
commited62a4d8bc688783b42b9e22a33ef6cc2b90589a (patch)
treedb45e4b49fb505d42a237e3b2256567a6d77d13d
parentf6e053ad603bc48ee828aa73696a9ed28724e3aa (diff)
chp2: half-finished thoughts about apocalypse vs catastrophe
-rw-r--r--chapter2.md14
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/chapter2.md b/chapter2.md
index 8177adc..4824163 100644
--- a/chapter2.md
+++ b/chapter2.md
@@ -64,13 +64,13 @@ facing with courage her grief and her own inevitable death. Even a talented
writer such as Foster, intentionally seeking to break new imaginative ground for
conceptualising green crises, seems unable to escape the motif of catastrophe.
-This has led many people to think that this catastrophism is the root cause of
-the problem. Some have even labelled this trope 'apocalypticism' and thus blamed
-the apocalyptic imagination, accusing apocalypse as being life-denying,
-pessimistic, quietist, destructive, and hopeless. They point out that while
-catastrophic narratives often place the catastrophe in a sudden event in the
-near future, green issues such as climate change are often gradual, continuous
-events which have already started.
+Famously, the Apocalypse of St John prominently features cataclysmic events,
+beginning with the opening of the first of the seven seals in chapter 6,
+unleashing the notorious 'Four Horsemen.' Catastrophe can be considered an
+apocalyptic literary feature. \[NEEDS MORE WORK\]
+
+Recently, academics examining green rhetoric have raised concerns with this
+catastrophism.
In fact, the Apocalypse of St John is very different from catastrophism.