diff options
| author | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-08-04 13:13:41 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-08-04 13:13:41 +0100 |
| commit | a074873fbb5dcfc161f634590443ac5932bab3f9 (patch) | |
| tree | 7ad5fa07e1f9dc2f804bbda30976f809de02b424 | |
| parent | db34bb904fe0064ab5234382c12c06e972314ab8 (diff) | |
chp4: rm 'in this chapter, '
| -rw-r--r-- | chapter4.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/chapter4.md b/chapter4.md index 5ae3f14..129e441 100644 --- a/chapter4.md +++ b/chapter4.md @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ rhetoric is too often failing, and discussed the particular criticism of the use of catastrophic language. In the previous chapter, I argued that these criticisms of catastrophic language do not apply to the use of apocalyptic language in the most important model of apocalyptic rhetoric in Western -literature, namely, the Apocalypse of John. Now, in this chapter, I aim to +literature, namely, the Apocalypse of John. Now, I aim to show that in order for green rhetoric to succeed, it should imitate the apocalyptic rhetorical strategies of the Apocalypse discussed in the previous chapter. |
