summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-08-04 13:13:41 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-08-04 13:13:41 +0100
commita074873fbb5dcfc161f634590443ac5932bab3f9 (patch)
tree7ad5fa07e1f9dc2f804bbda30976f809de02b424
parentdb34bb904fe0064ab5234382c12c06e972314ab8 (diff)
chp4: rm 'in this chapter, '
-rw-r--r--chapter4.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/chapter4.md b/chapter4.md
index 5ae3f14..129e441 100644
--- a/chapter4.md
+++ b/chapter4.md
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ rhetoric is too often failing, and discussed the particular criticism of the use
of catastrophic language. In the previous chapter, I argued that these
criticisms of catastrophic language do not apply to the use of apocalyptic
language in the most important model of apocalyptic rhetoric in Western
-literature, namely, the Apocalypse of John. Now, in this chapter, I aim to
+literature, namely, the Apocalypse of John. Now, I aim to
show that in order for green rhetoric to succeed, it should imitate the
apocalyptic rhetorical strategies of the Apocalypse discussed in the previous chapter.