diff options
| author | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-04-21 15:24:22 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-04-21 15:24:22 +0100 |
| commit | 992a2fd3e3644499ca5a66ffdb2cc49297443a23 (patch) | |
| tree | 08330bf4e88609afd0bd2eb0ac7a30f6b5583244 | |
| parent | fd2e7ace1d2812f38f0f9c8dd94bace61598513c (diff) | |
reading log: flannery 2024
| -rw-r--r-- | reading-log.md | 41 |
1 files changed, 41 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/reading-log.md b/reading-log.md index 563ee72..95edc55 100644 --- a/reading-log.md +++ b/reading-log.md @@ -6,6 +6,47 @@ author: Joe Carstairs ## 2026-04-21 +### @{flannery-2024} + +Flannery offers five big reasons why 'climate apocalypse' is unhelpful and +should be avoided. + +1. 'Apocalypse' is reduced in many folks' imaginations to 'end of the world', + missing out the world-creating aspects of traditional apocalyptic, inspiring + despair and thus leading to inaction. +2. (For many evangelical Christians) if climate change is identified with the + end times, that encourages people to welcome climate change instead of fight + it. +3. If climate change is the end times, human action to avert it is irrelevant, + or given over to a scientific/technological/industrial saviour. +4. Apocalypses punish the wicked and vindicate the righteous. When climate + apocalypses are told in e.g. the US, this suggests that the US is a victim, + not an instigator, of climate change, which is perverse. +5. Climate apocalypse obscures the fact that human beings are responsible for + climate change. + +Before that, he makes a few big points: + +- Industrial CO2 is causing major climate change, causing unprecedented + existential threats to human civilization and wellbeing. The scientists tell + us that we must cut emissions sharply immediately to avoid the worst effects + and setting off tipping points. Our leading prospect for change, international + collective action by nations, is unlikely to deliver the necessary change in + time. +- Journalists and campaigners are increasingly using 'climate apocalypse'. +- Audiences' intentions, moods, and actions are guided by millenia of social + memory, which embed associations between 'apocalypse' and a web of meanings, + even unconsciously. + +I think Flannery exposes some real and serious dangers with climate apocalyptic. +However, he under-explores positive possibilities: the world-creating aspects of +traditional apocalyptic, unconsciously embedded in social memories even by those +who think 'apocalypse' = 'end of the world.' + +It would be worth responding to all these criticisms of climate apocalypse, +especially points 2, 3, 4, and 5. I have inklings how this might be done, to the +end that some climate apocalyptic is bad, but some avoids these problems. + ## 2026-04-17 ### @{revelation-vision-of-a-just-world} |
