summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-08-03 14:33:14 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-08-03 14:33:14 +0100
commit8fb241257a5622005e56bc627147472023ed7192 (patch)
tree611c61f1ace00cb3fafd306864afe679d7647e6f
parent7d557086ef6383303e0015e78aaccca48c1343e9 (diff)
abstract: mention Apocalypse
-rw-r--r--frontmatter.yml1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/frontmatter.yml b/frontmatter.yml
index 109ca1c..b4bb073 100644
--- a/frontmatter.yml
+++ b/frontmatter.yml
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ abstract: >-
working. Some scholars, attempting to explain what's gone wrong, pinpoint how
green rhetoric uses apocalyptic language, and implies that green rhetoric
would be more effective were it to be less apocalyptic. In this dissertation,
+ using the Apocalypse of John as a model of apocalyptic language,
I argue against this conclusion, and aim to show that, in order to succeed,
green rhetoric must become more apocalyptic, not less.
geometry: