summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-06-09 10:33:46 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-06-09 10:33:46 +0100
commit7e2d86de355ee56c7d6273eef91d5595e8fe3089 (patch)
tree7603faf248731349f2ff3bce2658fad6e90c6713
parentd151ea7fddfcf7aa1733e0b28c79634a3ebd899d (diff)
removes thesis and bullet-point summary from chp1
-rw-r--r--chapter1.md10
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/chapter1.md b/chapter1.md
index b717d81..f77bda5 100644
--- a/chapter1.md
+++ b/chapter1.md
@@ -1,15 +1,5 @@
## Chapter 1
-Thesis: contemporary green rhetoric is a failure because it mis-diagnoses the
-root causes of the problems, fails to identify credible routes to credible
-solutions, and fails to identify an appropriate audience.
-
-1. Contemporary green rhetoric (R) is a failure
-2. R mis-diagnoses the problem
-3. R fails to identify credible routes to credible solutions
-4. R fails to identify an audience that can be persuaded to make a difference
-5. The material results of R have been dismal
-
Since the 1990s, the green movement has been on the back foot. There have of
course been many green successes on the local scale. But, in stark contrast to
the 1960s and 1970s, when the green lobby succeeded in delivering strong