diff options
| author | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-08-04 13:11:02 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net> | 2026-08-04 13:11:02 +0100 |
| commit | 51e2f75e2c4ce3e35f45bf54e597dd5d55b1e985 (patch) | |
| tree | 6c61c3aa2efa036888430836b1c3f5c3787540a5 | |
| parent | 97c1da7be31686f72464ccce70b356c6f58d8a07 (diff) | |
rm 'in fact'
| -rw-r--r-- | chapter2.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/chapter2.md b/chapter2.md index 027b470..7a08c40 100644 --- a/chapter2.md +++ b/chapter2.md @@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ A second problem with catastrophic language is that it is conservative. For some rhetors, the urgency of the crisis means that established power structures must be supported to work at full throttle, and we certainly haven't got time to replace or radically transform them. But if, as -many political analysts contend, green harms are in fact an inevitable -consequence of business as usual, such narratives then obstruct the radical +many political analysts contend, green harms are an inevitable +consequence of business as usual, then such narratives obstruct the radical political critique which will be necessary for a lasting solution to green issues. For example, the International Monetary Fund recently reported: |