summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-20 16:46:58 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-07-20 16:46:58 +0100
commit2b5a0cf2149f0ccb4a1992311cc68e6212f9449f (patch)
tree38d4bf89c31cb22fdcf1c7275cac4272da016dc9
parenta6d259d0a9c75b6d6baa0906d1587c1ffeef9602 (diff)
chp3: remove irrelevant tail on role of imagination, perspective
-rw-r--r--chapter3.md28
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/chapter3.md b/chapter3.md
index 82998d5..94842d5 100644
--- a/chapter3.md
+++ b/chapter3.md
@@ -316,31 +316,3 @@ John steels his audience for suffering, and reassures those who are already
suffering that their troubles are part of a cosmic context. And with his
treatment of the end times, John inspires his audience with hope that their
sufferings will not be wasted.
-
-\[TODO: see if next three paras are relevant.\]
-
-John's apocalyptic imagination uses mythological language to reveal the world of
-appearances for what it really is. The ideology of Empire is a pretender God,
-and the suffering of the martyrs is in fact God's way of conquering evil. John
-may have created a crisis for a people that didn't see one, a people that needed
-'waking up'. So, while catastrophism imagines that all humanity approaches the
-catastrophe more or less from the same perspective, and thus works to kill
-politics, John's apocalyptic imagination imagines precisely the opposite: he
-enlivens political criticism and active resistance to dominant structures by
-identifying how people relate unequally to them.
-
-So people today, when they equate apocalypticism with catastrophism, are cutting
-out most of the apocalyptic imagination and distorting its message. This is now
-new. This is a very traditional move which functions to shut down radical
-dissent against dominant structures.
-
-Meanwhile, those who have read the Apocalypse 'from below' tend to emphasise how
-it has a visionary interpretation of the tribulations of this world, and a
-visionary expectation of this world being transformed, and use this vision to
-motivate movements for transformational social change.
-
-The apocalyptic form is therefore not the reason that green rhetoric is failing.
-As explored in chapter 1, green rhetoric is failing because it is failing to
-diagnose the root causes of the problem, present a credible route to a credible
-solution, and address an audience that could be persuaded to make a difference.
-Were rhetors to solve these problems, they could use apocalyptic effectively.