summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-08-04 14:00:00 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-08-04 14:00:21 +0100
commit0e39f071a7be97d8e9268b745177f830b34312af (patch)
treeeeb1124e7000111194fa01aefc636c7a78dcd668
parent230c9b32ce9f3c2fa71711a8856c54e97a31a82d (diff)
chp3: reword topic sentence on john's catastrophism
-rw-r--r--chapter3.md8
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/chapter3.md b/chapter3.md
index c6cbb9f..85cff35 100644
--- a/chapter3.md
+++ b/chapter3.md
@@ -37,12 +37,8 @@ I'll show how three further aspects of his apocalyptic language add to his
rhetorical strategy. In the next chapter, I'll show how these features of John's
ancient rhetoric can be reproduced effectively in a contemporary green context.
-In the previous chapter, we saw how some kinds of catastrophic language
-prominent in contemporary green rhetoric can elicit fatalism and conservatism
-and support the 'death of politics.' To understand why John's catastrophic
-language had a very different effect, it is important to first understand that
-John has a very different catastrophic dialectic.
-
+To understand why John's catastrophic language is so important to his rhetorical strategy,
+it is important to first understand that John has a very different catastrophic dialectic.
Whereas green rhetors typically position the catastrophe as an impending event
over which the audience has some measure of control, John, in contrast,
discusses a series of catastrophes which have already begun, and are largely in