joeac/joeac.net
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity

Blog posts (#2)

Browse Source 
* Blog posts

* Adds blog image

---------

Co-authored-by: Joe Carstairs <65492573+Sycamost@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit is contained in:
Joe Carstairs
2024-05-05 21:01:35 +01:00
committed by GitHub
parent 86450b3dd8
commit 283495ce22
3 changed files with 314 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

BIN
public/images/blog/2024/05/02/beautiful_youtube_homepage.jpg Normal file
View File

Binary file not shown.
Side by Side

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 55 KiB

253
src/content/blog/2024/04/14/god_is_not_great.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
---
title: God Is Not Great, initial thoughts
description: >-
My spark notes on Hitchen's classic 2007 polemic against religion, plus some
initial thoughts on how I want to respond to it.
pubDate:
year: 2024
month: 04
day: 14
---
These are my 'spark notes' on _God Is Not Great_, Christopher Hitchen's classic
2007 polemic against religion in all its forms, and call to adopt secular
humanism as its rightful replacement.
The book can be coherently read as a collection of independent essays. That
said, with a few exceptions, each chapter in _God Is Not Great_ contributes to
one of three main themes, and I think this is a helpful way of summarising the
overall movement of the book. The three themes I've identified are as follows:
<ol>
<li>
<a href="#1-religion-is-evil">Religion is evil</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="#2-religion-is-untrue">Religion is untrue</a>
</li>
<li>
<a href="#3-secular-humanism-is-a-better-alternative-to-religion">Secular humanism is a better alternative to religion</a>
</li>
</ol>
As for the exceptions: Chapters 13 and 17 in part contribute to both the first
theme and the third, while Chapters 1, 3, 12 and 14 don't fit into these broad
themes, and are self-standing.
## 1. Religion is evil
- Chp 2
- Religion is violent, because:
- It has to be missionary, because it is insecure in its own beliefs (p17)
- It provokes tribalistic conflict, in a similar manner to racism (pp35-36)
- Chp 4
- Religion is bad for your health, because:
- Faith in medicine is a threat to religion's thrall (p47)
- Religious doctrines may contradict sound medical advice
- The right to religious freedom may be abused to deflect criticism of
unhealthy practices (p50)
- Religion has a special relationship with child abuse, and is incapable of
accepting open moral criticism of itself for this
- Chp 13
- Religion tends towards evil, because it requires fanaticism in order to
spread, and fanaticism tends towards evil (p192)
- Chp 16
- Religion causes child abuse, because:
- Terrifying children with eschatology is child abuse
- Religious education is propaganda and should not be inflicted on children
who are not yet mature enough to respond to it rationally
- Religion consistently mandates cruel genital mutilation of children
- Christians and Muslims have spread misinformation about masturbation,
which leads to dangerously sexually repressed adult men, which in turn
leads to sexual abuse of children by those men (as well as sexual abuse of
women)
- Child abuse in churches is not a case of a few bad eggs, it is
institutional and based on an ideological need to control the minds and
sexual organs of children
- Religion institutionalised torture in medieval Europe
- Religion makes honest and nuanced debate about abortion impossible, because:
- Nuanced debate is pushed out by extreme and implausible religious doctrine
- Religious people would rather use the unborn as objects of doctrine than
human beings in need of protection
- Chp 17
- Religion is the only reason anti-Semitism is possible
- Religion in its fullest expression is indistinguishable from
totalitarianism, because:
- The defining characteristic of both religion and totalitarianism is the
absolute right to rule of the ruler, even when they rule with caprice
- Religion and totalitarianism are also characterised by the need to
extinguish heresy with violence
- Religion and totalitarianism alike must propose a total solution to all
life's problems, require blind faith from its adherents, and demand all
aspects of life public and private be submitted to total supervision. This
doesn't bring out the best in us
- Religious/totalitarian systems are unable to take accountability and
therefore improve over time, in contrast to secular humanist systems
- History has proven this as fact:
- In the ancient world, religious totalitarianism was the normal form of
government
- Calvin, the inspiration for the Presbyterian Christian tradition, which
included South African apartheid, was the epitome of a totalitarian
dictator, demanding total control on the private lives of his citizens
in Geneva, on the pain of humiliation in this life and eternal torment
in the next
- History has also proven that, rather than standing in opposition to the
supposedly secular totalitarianisms of the twentieth century, religion
actually aided and abetted totalitarianism:
- Rome supported fascist movements throughout Europe, including Italy,
Hungary, Spain, and Ireland
- Rome accommodated Naziism by handing over control of its schools,
permitting the use of parish records to identify those with Jewish
ancestry, disbanding Catholic opposition political parties, declaring
Hitler's birthday a Church holiday, and running the 'rat line' to South
America after the military defeat of Naziism
- Although not quite as arse-licking as the Vatican, Germany's Protestant
churches also mostly capitulated to Nazi totalitarianism
- Japanese soldiers committed enormous atrocities across the Far East in
the name of their god-emperor, Hirohito
- The strategy of the Communists was first, to use religion as a prop to
gain power, and then to replace religion with itself. Notice the
striking commonalities between religion and communist totalitarianism:
- Infallible leaders
- A permanent war on heresy
- Institutionalised torture
- Scapegoating the innocent rather than accepting accountability for
failures
- Justifying any means necessary in order to achieve an ultimate end
## 2. Religion is untrue
- Chp 5
- Religion was a barbaric attempt to explain physical phenomena. Science now
does a much better job, so religion can be discarded as a redundant theory
- Chp 6
- Religion is 'solipsistic', which is to say:
- Religion divides the world into an in-group and an out-group
- When the in-group receives good fortune, that is interpreted as God's
blessing
- When the in-group receives bad fortune, this is inexplicable
- Whatever happens to the out-group is irrelevant
- This is a redundant theory which explains little, and therefore we should
not believe it
- Chp 7
- We should believe that the Pentateuch is a fiction, because:
- Exodus is inconsistent with the archaeological evidence
- Textual evidence in Deuteronomy suggests the texts were written much later
than the supposed events were supposed to have taken place
- Throughout the Pentateuch, Moses is referred to in the third person, which
is not consistent with the claim that Moses himself authored it
- The Pentateuch contains events we should _hope_ to be false, such as Moses
ordering multiple massacres, and the Ten Commandments classifying wives as
their husbands' property
- The Pentateuch - indeed, the whole Bible - is limited in scope to a small
corner of the Middle East, which is not consistent with the universal
nature of the supposed God who is supposed to have inspired its authorship
- Chp 8
- We should not believe the Gospels, because:
- Matthew and Luke disagree on the virgin conception
- Matthew and Luke disagree on the genealogy of Jesus
- Matthew and Luke disagree on when Mary and Jesus escaped to Egypt
- Luke dates the birth of Christ during both the reign of Herod in Judea
and the governorship of Quirinius in Syria, but these two events did not
overlap, so this is impossible
- As far as we know, the Romans did not, and would not, demand that the
people assemble in one place in order to be counted for a census
- The Gospels disagree about the Sermon on the Mount
- The Gospels disagree about the Anointing of Jesus
- The Gospels disagree about the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus
- The Gospels disagree about the betrayal of Judas
- The Gospels disagree about the denial of Peter
- John suggests he thinks Jesus was probably born in Galilee to an
ordinary family with no proven link to King David's genealogy
- Mary's attested behaviour during the ministry of Jesus is not consistent
with the Nativity story
- John 8:3-11 (the stoning of the woman caught in adultery) is a later
insertion to John's Gospel
- Chp 9: the Koran is borrowed from a hotchpotch of Jewish and Christian
myths
- Chp 10
- Miracles (such as the Resurrection of Jesus) should not be believed,
because:
- See Hume's _On Miracles_
- Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
- Believing miracles is comparable to believing reports of aliens (p144)
- Chp 11
- Religions are founded in credulity
- Chp 15
- The crucifixion story makes no sense, because:
- I'm supposed to be morally responsible for Adam's sin, but I amn't!
- Even Adam can't be fully blamed for Adam's sin, because he was set up!
- The Jews who crucified Jesus are supposed to be blameworthy for their
crime, even though the crucifixion was allegedly both necessary and
inevitable
- I'm allegedly given the free will to either accept or deny the offer,
even though denying the offer will lead to an eternity of torment: any
sensible God who cared a mite would not have given me the choice
- Religious rules are impossible to follow, and this leads to either
spiritual policing, organised hypocrisy, or both
## 3. Secular humanism is a better alternative to religion
- Chp 13
- Faith has inspired great heroism. But the heroism is better explained by the
heroes' humanism than it is by their faith itself
- For example, Martin Luther King Junior didn't really preach Christianity,
because he preached forgiveness, while Christ preached eternal torment for
the 'inattentive' (pp175-6)
- Chp 17
- Religion is the only thing sustaining anti-Semitism
- Secular humanist political systems can take accountability, respond to
criticism and improve over time, while religious systems exempt themselves
from legitimate criticism, stifling progress
- The only alternative to totalitarianism is pluralism, which is inherently
secular
- Chp 18
- Secular humanism has been a powerful positive force throughout history in
face of oppression by religion, as proved by example:
- Socrates proved that conscience is innate, and that a great way to mock
dogma is with satire which pretends to accept that dogma
- Lucretius, Democritus and Epicurus had better explanations for the way the
world worked than religion (which is why their work was suppressed in
Christian Europe and nearly lost forever as a result). Once rediscovered,
their ideas kick-started the Scientific Revolution in Europe
- Spinoza's deistic ideas had a huge influence despite Jews collaborating
with their Christian oppressors to try and ban his writing out of
existence
- Boyle and Voltaire may have been closet atheists, agnostics or deists
- Kant 'overthrew' the cosmological and ontological arguments for the
existence of God, and proved (by means of the Categorical Imperative) that
human decency does not require any theological assumptions
- Let's chuck some more names in the ring: Gibbon, Hume, Paine, Franklin,
Darwin, Einstein
- Jews were once doubly ghettoed: on the outside by oppressive Christians,
and on the inside by oppressive self-racialisation. Secular humanism freed
Jews from both these ghettoes, which in turn led to an outpouring of
secular Jewish brilliance
- Ancient Jews were on the road to a quasi-secular Hellenism, before that
was ruined forever by the tyrannical and fanatical Judas Maccabeus, with
disastrous consequences for the history of Western civilisation. The
Abrahamic religions we know today were not inevitable, and it is possible
to imagine what Western history would have been like without it
- Chp 19
- Secular humanism is a better alternative to religion, because:
- Religion requires clinging to immovable dogma and being unwilling to
change your mind
- Seeking truth requires being willing to change your mind
- Secular humanism is therefore on the side of seeking truth, and religion
is on the side of wilful ignorance
- Secular humanism is on the side of progress, because it is what enables the
expansion of scientific knowledge and the development of new technology
## The odds and ends
- Chp 1: an introduction to the themes of the book with little substantial
- Chp 3: titled 'A Short Digression on the Pig', it does what it says on the tin
- Chp 12: titled 'A Coda: How Religions End', it does what it says on the tin
- Chp 14: contrary to the hopes of some Westerners disillusioned with organised
Western religion, Eastern religions like Buddhism, Hinduism and Taoism are not
a solution to the problems of religion
I would be interested to try writing apologetic and/or evangelistic responses to
these ideas. But it's not a priority for me right now. Anyway, if I ever want to
come back to it, I'll probably come back to these spark notes to give me a head
start.

61
src/content/blog/2024/05/02/no_more_youtube.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
---
title: How I made YouTube work for me
description: >-
I just learned YouTube channels have an RSS feed. This is terrific news.
pubDate:
year: 2024
month: 05
day: 02
---
One of my bad habits in life is wandering through YouTube. I've always had
AutoPlay turned off, but I still found myself switching off and sleepwalking
from one 'recommendation' to the next.
A lot of what I watch in these times is crap. It's often when I'm tired and just
want to switch off, so naturally enough, longer, more emotionally or
intellectually material – in other words, exactly the kind of videos I actually
**do** want to watch – I ignore. (For me, it's often mediocre sketch comedy
videos. That's my poison, it turns out.)
Now, there is a time for switching off and doing something light. But I don't
want watching junk videos to be my answer. Any more than when I'm hungry after
a long day of work, I don't want to be resorting to junk food all the time. I
really want to get out of this bad habit, and though it's not a huge problem,
I've still not been able to fully kick it, either.
Still, there are YouTube channels I really _want_ to keep up with. Musicians.
Short film channels. Video essayists. And, yes, even one or two sketch channels:
though YouTube is a bit flooded with sketch comedy, some it is really good and
brings me joy, and that's a good thing!
This is where RSS comes in.
So if you don't know, an RSS file is a file someone puts on their website which
tells you, in a standard format, what pages are on their website. It's a pretty
old standard in Web terms, and it's very stable. There are a wide range of apps
out there, called 'feed readers', which you can use to keep track of RSS feeds,
notifying you when something new gets published in your website and putting it
in a feed for you to review.
It turns out YouTube channels have RSS feeds.
This is terrific news.
It means I can use my RSS feed reader to subscribe to YouTube channels, instead
of YouTube's own subscription system.
And that means I don't need any of YouTube's personalisation features. I can
delete all my search history, all my watch history, and stop them from
collecting any more. This means YouTube is now incapable of providing
recommendations that I'm actually likely to click on. Which is exactly what I
want.
This is what my YouTube homepage looks like right now:
![My YouTube homepage with a blank space where the recommendations used to be](/images/blog/2024/05/02/beautiful_youtube_homepage.jpg)
So I can both subscribe to the channels I'm genuinely interested in, and not
get sucked into watching junk.
Awesome!