summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/website/src/data
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <jcarstairs@scottlogic.com>2024-07-18 16:49:24 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <jcarstairs@scottlogic.com>2024-07-18 16:49:24 +0100
commit55513aa4164c01ba2b178d8eaef45ef4eaeb064a (patch)
treeac27e3b0d167823c925c5ee32a2ecd0c7b48e93e /website/src/data
parent486207fb8840e1990beca19aef6fe940eeb98f03 (diff)
GS Top of the Mind 129
Diffstat (limited to 'website/src/data')
-rw-r--r--website/src/data/links.ts6
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/website/src/data/links.ts b/website/src/data/links.ts
index 9b1201d..579c78d 100644
--- a/website/src/data/links.ts
+++ b/website/src/data/links.ts
@@ -98,6 +98,12 @@ const LINKS: Link[] = [
description: "Pretty convincing to me. The biggest potential weakness in his argument is his claim that none of the most common reasons why devs disagree on story points exposes anything which ought to be resolved in an estimation meeting. If you can provide other common reasons besides the ones Dave considered, you could rebut his argument. I don't feel experienced enough to judge this myself.",
isoDateAdded: '2024-07-17',
},
+ {
+ href: 'https://www.goldmansachs.com/intelligence/pages/gs-research/gen-ai-too-much-spend-too-little-benefit/report.pdf',
+ title: 'Goldman Sachs Top of the Mind, Issue 129',
+ description: 'Read the interviews. Economists give interesting, and diverse, opinions on the economic potential of LLMs.',
+ isoDateAdded: '2024-07-18',
+ },
];
export default LINKS;