summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/blog
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <65492573+Sycamost@users.noreply.github.com>2024-01-14 21:06:59 +0000
committerJoe Carstairs <65492573+Sycamost@users.noreply.github.com>2024-01-14 21:10:13 +0000
commitcdb4315ae626265c5a99d1816dea281719272356 (patch)
tree6bc544a0a2e06b7c33f42fce56e114f1a31d88ec /blog
parent4181eff961dcf04bf5a599daeee34057b00bb570 (diff)
Adds first blog post
Diffstat (limited to 'blog')
-rw-r--r--blog/2024/01/14/sapiens_on_religion/index.html128
-rw-r--r--blog/index.html42
2 files changed, 170 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/blog/2024/01/14/sapiens_on_religion/index.html b/blog/2024/01/14/sapiens_on_religion/index.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..686b506
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blog/2024/01/14/sapiens_on_religion/index.html
@@ -0,0 +1,128 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html lang="en-GB">
+ <head>
+ <meta charset="utf-8" />
+ <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/reset.css" />
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/base.css" />
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/hcard.css" />
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/blog.css" />
+ <title>Hariri’s Sapiens on Religion | joeac’s blog</title>
+ </head>
+
+ <body>
+ <article class="h-entry">
+ <aside>
+ <p>This is a blog post by <a class="p-author h-card" href="/">Joe Carstairs</a></p>
+ <p>He wrote it on <time class="dt-published" datetime="2024-01-14">the 14<sup>th</sup> of January, 2024</time></p>
+ <p>Go back to his <a href="/blog">blog</a> if you like</p>
+ <p><a class="u-url uid" href="https://joeac.net/blog/2024/01/14/sapiens_on_religion">Permalink</a></p>
+ </aside>
+
+ <h1 class="p-name">Harari’s <i>Sapiens</i> on Religion</h1>
+ <p class="p-summary">
+ In which I discuss why I think Harari’s characterisation of religion
+ is inadequate because it’s too materialistic.
+ </p>
+
+ <div class="e-content">
+ <p>
+ I’ve been slowly re-reading Yuval Noah Harari’s 2014 classic,
+ <a href="https://www.ynharari.com/book/sapiens-2">Sapiens</a>,
+ which apart from being ridiculously over-scoped and hilariously
+ under-evidenced, is proving delightfully entertaining.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ I’ve just finished chapter 12, covering the world history of all
+ religion in thirty pages. Of course, at that level of brevity,
+ there will be many deficiencies. But here’s some thoughts - not
+ terribly well organised - which stand out to me.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ Hurari generally assumes a materialist metaphysic (a problem which
+ blights the book more generally). Nothing exists except physical stuff.
+ This gives him severe tunnel vision. As a consequence of this
+ restricting metaphysic, he is forced to adopt limiting accounts of what
+ the role of religion is in world history, and therefore what religion is.
+ </p>
+
+ <blockquote>
+ <p>
+ The crucial historical role of religion has been to give superhuman
+ legitimacy to [all social orders and hierarchies].
+ </p>
+ <p>…</p>
+ <p>
+ Religion can thus be defined as <em>a system of human norms and
+ values that is founded on a belief in a superhuman order</em>.
+ </p>
+ <footer>p. 234</footer>
+ </blockquote>
+
+ <p>
+ It might seem a little unfair to criticise Harari for giving a
+ materialist account of religion. <i>Sapiens</i> is, after all, a
+ materialist world history.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ But this account is just one extreme example of how that project, to
+ give a materialist account of world history, will inevitably lack the
+ metaphysical resources to really understand the human story.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ On Harari’s view, any human enterprise which attempts to understand
+ that which transcends direct human experience is at best an effort in
+ imaginative story-telling. All scientific theory, theology, ethics and
+ metaphysics either contorted out of all recognition into a pragmatic
+ fiction or is cast to the flames.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ In particular, it’s a view which is incapable of taking seriously some
+ of the most important questions human beings have grappled with in the
+ course of their history. Those who know me won’t be surprised at which
+ ones I’m going to pick out: who was the being which made their covenant
+ with Abraham? How is that promise being fulfilled? And who the heck was
+ Jesus of Nazareth?
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ If Harari’s characterisation of religion is adequate - and the Abrahamic
+ faiths come under that banner - then those questions are reduced to
+ nothing more profound than Doctor Who fans arguing over ‘canon’. The
+ question of who God is becomes a mere tool for the organisation of
+ society, rather than a substantial and important question on a matter
+ of fact.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ This is a shortcoming for its own sake: a materialist account of
+ religion cannot adequately account for the phenomenon of religion
+ itself.
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ But it is also a shortcoming even by its own lights. Without giving
+ serious consideration to the substantial matter of what Harari calls
+ ‘religion’ (which, to his mind, includes the Abrahamic faiths,
+ Hinduism, paganism, animism, Buddhism, Shintoism, Confucianism,
+ capitalism, communism and Nazism), even the material facts are
+ inexplicable. Why would, as Harari is keen to point out, out, people
+ fight and die over and over again for a fiction?
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ The material facts themselves prove that ‘religion’ as he construes it
+ is not window dressing to the real story of history. It cannot merely
+ serve as a mechanism in the churning of material history. It is itself
+ the centre of the story.
+ </p>
+ </div>
+ </article>
+ </body>
+</html>
+
diff --git a/blog/index.html b/blog/index.html
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..86e8b1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/blog/index.html
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html>
+<html lang="en-GB">
+ <head>
+ <meta charset="utf-8" />
+ <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" />
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/reset.css" />
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/base.css" />
+ <link rel="stylesheet" href="/hcard.css" />
+ </head>
+
+ <body>
+ <section class="h-feed">
+ <h1 class="p-name">
+ My blog
+ </h1>
+
+ <aside>
+ <p>
+ This blog is written by <a class="p-author h-card" href="/">Joe Carstairs</a>
+ </p>
+
+ <p>
+ <a class="u-url" href="https://joeac.net/blog">Permalink</a>
+ </p>
+ </aside>
+
+ <ul>
+ <li>
+ 2024
+ <ul>
+ <li class="h-entry">
+ <a class="u-url p-name" href="/blog/2024/01/14/sapiens_on_religion">
+ Harari’s <i>Sapiens</i> on Religion
+ </a>
+ </li>
+ </ul>
+ </li>
+ </ul>
+ </section>
+ </body>
+</html>
+