summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
-rw-r--r--website/src/content/blog/2025/06/23/work.md2
-rw-r--r--website/src/content/blog/2025/09/18/starting_msc.md88
2 files changed, 88 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/website/src/content/blog/2025/06/23/work.md b/website/src/content/blog/2025/06/23/work.md
index e2794a0..83f4b19 100644
--- a/website/src/content/blog/2025/06/23/work.md
+++ b/website/src/content/blog/2025/06/23/work.md
@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ description:
pubDate: 2025-06-23
---
-# Figuring things out
-
'You could always do a Panic Masters.' In my last year of undergraduate studies,
that was often the sort of advice we liked to console one another with. A lucky
few people in my year had a clear sense of vocation, but most of us felt
diff --git a/website/src/content/blog/2025/09/18/starting_msc.md b/website/src/content/blog/2025/09/18/starting_msc.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..eb4e59f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/website/src/content/blog/2025/09/18/starting_msc.md
@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+---
+title: Changing my ambitions
+description: >-
+ When I started my first degree, I had unrealistic and unhelpful ambitions. For
+ my second degree, I'm setting my sights on different targets.
+pubDate: 2025-09-18
+---
+
+Is 'virtue' a terribly old-fashioned word? I don't mind either way. If I've run
+into you for more than three seconds in the last couple of weeks, you'll know
+that I've just started my second degree, and I'm very happy about it. I'm having
+a great deal of fun, and expect my studies to continue to be fun. But fun is not
+my goal. My goal is virtue.
+
+In particular, the virtues I'm striving after in my degree are a greater ability
+to ask questions well, and to answer them well; to write well, and to dispute --
+that is, speak with, listen, reason, discuss -- well. Insightfully, sensitively,
+humanely, intelligently, informedly, fluently: well.
+
+But what about all the starving children! I hear you cry. In the past, I myself
+have got myself stuck fearing that doing another degree would be ignoring some
+more immediate duty to do something about all the evil in the world. So, is my
+degree selfish? Or how can it not be? How can this be good?
+
+I believe it's precisely by abandoning that restrictive sense of public duty
+which has freed me at last to do something good. Let me explain.
+
+During my first degree, I had a great deal of ambition. I was genuinely
+convinced that I could find robust answers to big questions if I thought about
+them hard enough. I thought I was clever enough to make progress, or at least
+contribute. I thought I could, if I wanted to, get into a PhD programme and end
+up employed as Dean of Philosophy of Oxford, paid to smoke from a pipe all day
+in a tweed jacket with leather patches while quietly resolving all the world's
+burning intellectual issues.
+
+What's changed? If I were a pessimist, I might mention my encounter with that
+devil, reality. It turns out that I'm not actually the cleverest person in the
+room, that the biggest philosophical problems are pretty intractable, and that I
+can't get into Oxford -- and even if I could, it wouldn't necessarily be right
+to uproot myself from my friends, family and church community to pursue my dream
+career.
+
+All this did matter a great deal. It's what slowly convinced me to finally drop
+those unrealistic philosophical ambitions. It's why, a year and a half ago, I
+turned down the offer of a Master's in Philosophy at a excellent university
+(albeit not Oxford).
+
+But that's not the whole story. I'm not sat here with a sob story of broken
+dreams. After I turned down that PhD, I didn't feel deflated, I felt liberated.
+I haven't just dropped those ambitions, I've found new ones.
+
+My friends, family and church community ought to matter far more to me, I
+realised, than my career. So, turning away from academia, I turned towards love.
+
+This is what the gospel does. It's the most good story, beautifully true, which
+says to the human heart: since God so loved us, so also we ought to love one
+another.
+
+When I'm targeting virtue, I find it helpful to imagine a character who displays
+the virtues I'm after. So picture Helpful John. He's an encouragement. Whenever
+you talk to Helpful John, you come away feeling emotionally mature and
+intellectually confident, because his overwhelming respect wipes away your
+anxiety. He listens to you carefully, and insists on understanding you at more
+than a superficial level. When it's appropriate to do so, he can ask devious
+questions which unlock new possibilities you hadn't considered before. He knows
+lots of relevant and often surprising facts. He can compare your perspective
+with that of strange and subversive alternative perspectives. He doesn't like to
+tell people what to think, but when he speaks or when he writes, you pay
+attention, because you know he is capable of profound insight.
+
+Helpful John sounds great. A model to replicate, right? Not in every respect,
+necessarily. Helpful John might not be the life and soul of the party. He might
+not be the first person you go to for comfort in times of trouble. He might not
+be the most reliable person in the world, or the best with children, or the best
+with hand tools. Helpful John is a character, but he doesn't have to be good at
+everything.
+
+Helpful John is roughly my north star. I don't expect to become Helpful John.
+But with the Spirit's help, with me continuing to lean in to the process, I do
+intend for Useless Joe to become more like Helpful John in his most enviable
+respects.
+
+Is this selfish? Is this a shortage of ambition? Wouldn't you love to have a
+Helpful John as a friend? A brother? Across the table at small group at church?
+In your workplace?
+
+So forgive me if I'm old-fashioned: I believe virtue is a virtue. A better world
+is one full of better people.