summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/common/microlog/2024-07-17.gmi
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-04-27 09:10:25 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-04-27 09:10:25 +0100
commitb53412d72885d77b1a98a5b143d91236791cccd1 (patch)
tree57acc0abda4763f55e7176d1e8b0bae14f2f0f7b /common/microlog/2024-07-17.gmi
parent3f9988d206fe4619eb04ca4210d3d1ccbc0461d9 (diff)
website: add microlog posts for old links
Diffstat (limited to 'common/microlog/2024-07-17.gmi')
-rw-r--r--common/microlog/2024-07-17.gmi3
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/common/microlog/2024-07-17.gmi b/common/microlog/2024-07-17.gmi
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..2b5a218
--- /dev/null
+++ b/common/microlog/2024-07-17.gmi
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Pretty convincing to me. The biggest potential weakness in his argument is his claim that none of the most common reasons why devs disagree on story points exposes anything which ought to be resolved in an estimation meeting. If you can provide other common reasons besides the ones Dave considered, you could rebut his argument. I don't feel experienced enough to judge this myself.
+
+=> https://blog.scottlogic.com/2024/07/05/story-points-are-wasting-time.html Story points are wasting time