summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/common/longlog
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-06-18 19:09:42 +0100
committerJoe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>2026-06-18 19:09:42 +0100
commita63b8c6a0b3b8b8230c821ffd77b0a075712a375 (patch)
treeba31e4dd7e109b3ac419f781a30e71a3390bab77 /common/longlog
parentef681069c7bc0d850381c9b2b00de6a48cc1c0e7 (diff)
replaces <hr /> with --- in 2024-07-16.gmi
Diffstat (limited to 'common/longlog')
-rw-r--r--common/longlog/2024-07-16.gmi2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/common/longlog/2024-07-16.gmi b/common/longlog/2024-07-16.gmi
index 447625a..b2fd57f 100644
--- a/common/longlog/2024-07-16.gmi
+++ b/common/longlog/2024-07-16.gmi
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ Some authors have managed to recognise the ambiguity of the term. Both King et a
So it seems that although many academics have treated the term ‘hallucination’ as jargon, in actual fact, there is no widely agreed specific meaning of the word.
-<hr />
+---
I will slide in here with a quick side note. While some authors treated ‘hallucination’ as jargon for unfaithfulness or unfactuality, other authors contemporaneously managed to talk about these topics without using the word ‘hallucination’ at all. Here are some examples: