From 0d1b0531cecb6e4fdabee0e4c4e16079328f54e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joe Carstairs Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 15:26:29 +0100 Subject: adds a bit about de-politicisation --- chapter5.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'chapter5.md') diff --git a/chapter5.md b/chapter5.md index 86805b6..0f7b83d 100644 --- a/chapter5.md +++ b/chapter5.md @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ aren't feasible. Why are green rhetors failing on the fundamentals? One common suggestion, explored in chapter 2, is that green rhetors should avoid the motif of catastrophe, or, in a certain sense, 'apocalypse.' Catastrophic rhetoric has been accused of creating -resignation, despair, apathy, and dismissal, and of killing genuine politics, +resignation, despair, apathy, and dismissal, and of killing political contest, driving the fundamental problems discussed in chapter 1. This line of thought, together with the fact that 'apocalypse' is treated as a catastrophic symbol in popular culture, leads Frances Flannery to suggest that -- cgit v1.2.3