From f6a6e14ff6218e730e471959b8436f2ebd0a0c1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joe Carstairs Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 12:53:29 +0100 Subject: mention John in chp0 summary --- chapter0.md | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/chapter0.md b/chapter0.md index 54ef7ad..1f37888 100644 --- a/chapter0.md +++ b/chapter0.md @@ -82,5 +82,6 @@ rhetoric is failing to deliver political change, before exploring in more detail one particular allegation: green rhetoric is too catastrophic, or, in the terms of some critics, 'apocalyptic.' In contrast, I will argue not only that green rhetors must continue to use catastrophic language, but they must also draw -deeper on other aspects of apocalyptic language which have been heretofore -neglected, if green rhetors are to play their part in delivering change. +deeper on other aspects of apocalyptic language as modelled by John of the +Apocalypse which have been heretofore neglected, if green rhetors are to play +their part in delivering change. -- cgit v1.2.3