From b5ca404884a89c8eb4bfaa33a2da4b7d2548099e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joe Carstairs Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 12:03:42 +0100 Subject: chp3: rework summary --- chapter3.md | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/chapter3.md b/chapter3.md index 18eb62b..3ea011f 100644 --- a/chapter3.md +++ b/chapter3.md @@ -1,13 +1,12 @@ ## Chapter 3 Thesis: green rhetors need to use apocalyptic rhetoric in order to motivate -their PMC audiences to a martyrdom ethic. +their audiences to a martyrdom ethic. -13. John's rhetoric exhorts his audience to a martyrdom ethic -14. R needs to exhort their audiences to a martyrdom ethic -15. Socialist rhetoric in the past has used apocalypticism for this very purpose -16. Once rhetors addressing the PMC have fixed all the other problems with R, - they'll need this apocalyptic hope, too +13. Green rhetors need to exhort their audiences to a martyrdom ethic +14. As a result, they need to use minority cognition... +15. ...and to steel their audience for tribulations... +16. ...and to speculate on some kind of 'end times'. In the previous two chapters, I've explored how and why contemporary green rhetoric is too often failing, and argued that the apocalyptic form is not one -- cgit v1.2.3