summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/chapter1.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'chapter1.md')
-rw-r--r--chapter1.md8
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/chapter1.md b/chapter1.md
index a386a75..d15d01d 100644
--- a/chapter1.md
+++ b/chapter1.md
@@ -22,8 +22,11 @@ the WWF's measure of wildlife populations, has declined by almost three quarters
since 1970 [@living-planet].
All these failures beg the question: why aren't the green movement's strategies
-working? \[EXAMPLE OF GREEN LEADER ASKING THIS QUESTION\] In particular, I want
-to focus on green rhetoric.
+working? 'Has public attention gone numb?' asks journalist Harrison Stetler. 'Is
+the sense of crisis faced with the devastating effects of climate change feeding
+passivity — or even the rush to preserve past privileges — rather than
+mobilization?' [@stetler-2025] In particular, I want to focus on the movement's
+rhetoric.
Rhetoric, as I'm using the term, refers to an utterance with an agenda. When
green rhetoric works well, it solves a problem relevant to green concerns. In
@@ -562,4 +565,3 @@ catastrophic language is counter-productive in this context.
## TODO
- Find quotes and page numbers in @{back-to-nature} and @{heat}
-- Find an example: green rhetor doing some soul-searching