250 lines
14 KiB
YAML
250 lines
14 KiB
YAML
title: God Is Not Great, initial thoughts
|
|
description: >-
|
|
My spark notes on Hitchen's classic 2007 polemic against religion, plus some
|
|
initial thoughts on how I want to respond to it.
|
|
pubDate: 2024-04-14
|
|
|
|
content: |
|
|
These are my 'spark notes' on _God Is Not Great_, Christopher Hitchen's classic
|
|
2007 polemic against religion in all its forms, and call to adopt secular
|
|
humanism as its rightful replacement.
|
|
|
|
The book can be coherently read as a collection of independent essays. That
|
|
said, with a few exceptions, each chapter in _God Is Not Great_ contributes to
|
|
one of three main themes, and I think this is a helpful way of summarising the
|
|
overall movement of the book. The three themes I've identified are as follows:
|
|
|
|
<ol>
|
|
<li>
|
|
<a href="#1-religion-is-evil">Religion is evil</a>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li>
|
|
<a href="#2-religion-is-untrue">Religion is untrue</a>
|
|
</li>
|
|
<li>
|
|
<a href="#3-secular-humanism-is-a-better-alternative-to-religion">Secular humanism is a better alternative to religion</a>
|
|
</li>
|
|
</ol>
|
|
|
|
As for the exceptions: Chapters 13 and 17 in part contribute to both the first
|
|
theme and the third, while Chapters 1, 3, 12 and 14 don't fit into these broad
|
|
themes, and are self-standing.
|
|
|
|
## 1. Religion is evil
|
|
|
|
- Chp 2
|
|
- Religion is violent, because:
|
|
- It has to be missionary, because it is insecure in its own beliefs (p17)
|
|
- It provokes tribalistic conflict, in a similar manner to racism (pp35-36)
|
|
- Chp 4
|
|
- Religion is bad for your health, because:
|
|
- Faith in medicine is a threat to religion's thrall (p47)
|
|
- Religious doctrines may contradict sound medical advice
|
|
- The right to religious freedom may be abused to deflect criticism of
|
|
unhealthy practices (p50)
|
|
- Religion has a special relationship with child abuse, and is incapable of
|
|
accepting open moral criticism of itself for this
|
|
- Chp 13
|
|
- Religion tends towards evil, because it requires fanaticism in order to
|
|
spread, and fanaticism tends towards evil (p192)
|
|
- Chp 16
|
|
- Religion causes child abuse, because:
|
|
- Terrifying children with eschatology is child abuse
|
|
- Religious education is propaganda and should not be inflicted on children
|
|
who are not yet mature enough to respond to it rationally
|
|
- Religion consistently mandates cruel genital mutilation of children
|
|
- Christians and Muslims have spread misinformation about masturbation,
|
|
which leads to dangerously sexually repressed adult men, which in turn
|
|
leads to sexual abuse of children by those men (as well as sexual abuse of
|
|
women)
|
|
- Child abuse in churches is not a case of a few bad eggs, it is
|
|
institutional and based on an ideological need to control the minds and
|
|
sexual organs of children
|
|
- Religion institutionalised torture in medieval Europe
|
|
- Religion makes honest and nuanced debate about abortion impossible, because:
|
|
- Nuanced debate is pushed out by extreme and implausible religious doctrine
|
|
- Religious people would rather use the unborn as objects of doctrine than
|
|
human beings in need of protection
|
|
- Chp 17
|
|
- Religion is the only reason anti-Semitism is possible
|
|
- Religion in its fullest expression is indistinguishable from
|
|
totalitarianism, because:
|
|
- The defining characteristic of both religion and totalitarianism is the
|
|
absolute right to rule of the ruler, even when they rule with caprice
|
|
- Religion and totalitarianism are also characterised by the need to
|
|
extinguish heresy with violence
|
|
- Religion and totalitarianism alike must propose a total solution to all
|
|
life's problems, require blind faith from its adherents, and demand all
|
|
aspects of life public and private be submitted to total supervision. This
|
|
doesn't bring out the best in us
|
|
- Religious/totalitarian systems are unable to take accountability and
|
|
therefore improve over time, in contrast to secular humanist systems
|
|
- History has proven this as fact:
|
|
- In the ancient world, religious totalitarianism was the normal form of
|
|
government
|
|
- Calvin, the inspiration for the Presbyterian Christian tradition, which
|
|
included South African apartheid, was the epitome of a totalitarian
|
|
dictator, demanding total control on the private lives of his citizens
|
|
in Geneva, on the pain of humiliation in this life and eternal torment
|
|
in the next
|
|
- History has also proven that, rather than standing in opposition to the
|
|
supposedly secular totalitarianisms of the twentieth century, religion
|
|
actually aided and abetted totalitarianism:
|
|
- Rome supported fascist movements throughout Europe, including Italy,
|
|
Hungary, Spain, and Ireland
|
|
- Rome accommodated Naziism by handing over control of its schools,
|
|
permitting the use of parish records to identify those with Jewish
|
|
ancestry, disbanding Catholic opposition political parties, declaring
|
|
Hitler's birthday a Church holiday, and running the 'rat line' to South
|
|
America after the military defeat of Naziism
|
|
- Although not quite as arse-licking as the Vatican, Germany's Protestant
|
|
churches also mostly capitulated to Nazi totalitarianism
|
|
- Japanese soldiers committed enormous atrocities across the Far East in
|
|
the name of their god-emperor, Hirohito
|
|
- The strategy of the Communists was first, to use religion as a prop to
|
|
gain power, and then to replace religion with itself. Notice the
|
|
striking commonalities between religion and communist totalitarianism:
|
|
- Infallible leaders
|
|
- A permanent war on heresy
|
|
- Institutionalised torture
|
|
- Scapegoating the innocent rather than accepting accountability for
|
|
failures
|
|
- Justifying any means necessary in order to achieve an ultimate end
|
|
|
|
## 2. Religion is untrue
|
|
|
|
- Chp 5
|
|
- Religion was a barbaric attempt to explain physical phenomena. Science now
|
|
does a much better job, so religion can be discarded as a redundant theory
|
|
- Chp 6
|
|
- Religion is 'solipsistic', which is to say:
|
|
- Religion divides the world into an in-group and an out-group
|
|
- When the in-group receives good fortune, that is interpreted as God's
|
|
blessing
|
|
- When the in-group receives bad fortune, this is inexplicable
|
|
- Whatever happens to the out-group is irrelevant
|
|
- This is a redundant theory which explains little, and therefore we should
|
|
not believe it
|
|
- Chp 7
|
|
- We should believe that the Pentateuch is a fiction, because:
|
|
- Exodus is inconsistent with the archaeological evidence
|
|
- Textual evidence in Deuteronomy suggests the texts were written much later
|
|
than the supposed events were supposed to have taken place
|
|
- Throughout the Pentateuch, Moses is referred to in the third person, which
|
|
is not consistent with the claim that Moses himself authored it
|
|
- The Pentateuch contains events we should _hope_ to be false, such as Moses
|
|
ordering multiple massacres, and the Ten Commandments classifying wives as
|
|
their husbands' property
|
|
- The Pentateuch - indeed, the whole Bible - is limited in scope to a small
|
|
corner of the Middle East, which is not consistent with the universal
|
|
nature of the supposed God who is supposed to have inspired its authorship
|
|
- Chp 8
|
|
- We should not believe the Gospels, because:
|
|
- Matthew and Luke disagree on the virgin conception
|
|
- Matthew and Luke disagree on the genealogy of Jesus
|
|
- Matthew and Luke disagree on when Mary and Jesus escaped to Egypt
|
|
- Luke dates the birth of Christ during both the reign of Herod in Judea
|
|
and the governorship of Quirinius in Syria, but these two events did not
|
|
overlap, so this is impossible
|
|
- As far as we know, the Romans did not, and would not, demand that the
|
|
people assemble in one place in order to be counted for a census
|
|
- The Gospels disagree about the Sermon on the Mount
|
|
- The Gospels disagree about the Anointing of Jesus
|
|
- The Gospels disagree about the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus
|
|
- The Gospels disagree about the betrayal of Judas
|
|
- The Gospels disagree about the denial of Peter
|
|
- John suggests he thinks Jesus was probably born in Galilee to an
|
|
ordinary family with no proven link to King David's genealogy
|
|
- Mary's attested behaviour during the ministry of Jesus is not consistent
|
|
with the Nativity story
|
|
- John 8:3-11 (the stoning of the woman caught in adultery) is a later
|
|
insertion to John's Gospel
|
|
- Chp 9: the Koran is borrowed from a hotchpotch of Jewish and Christian
|
|
myths
|
|
- Chp 10
|
|
- Miracles (such as the Resurrection of Jesus) should not be believed,
|
|
because:
|
|
- See Hume's _On Miracles_
|
|
- Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
|
|
- Believing miracles is comparable to believing reports of aliens (p144)
|
|
- Chp 11
|
|
- Religions are founded in credulity
|
|
- Chp 15
|
|
- The crucifixion story makes no sense, because:
|
|
- I'm supposed to be morally responsible for Adam's sin, but I amn't!
|
|
- Even Adam can't be fully blamed for Adam's sin, because he was set up!
|
|
- The Jews who crucified Jesus are supposed to be blameworthy for their
|
|
crime, even though the crucifixion was allegedly both necessary and
|
|
inevitable
|
|
- I'm allegedly given the free will to either accept or deny the offer,
|
|
even though denying the offer will lead to an eternity of torment: any
|
|
sensible God who cared a mite would not have given me the choice
|
|
- Religious rules are impossible to follow, and this leads to either
|
|
spiritual policing, organised hypocrisy, or both
|
|
|
|
## 3. Secular humanism is a better alternative to religion
|
|
|
|
- Chp 13
|
|
- Faith has inspired great heroism. But the heroism is better explained by the
|
|
heroes' humanism than it is by their faith itself
|
|
- For example, Martin Luther King Junior didn't really preach Christianity,
|
|
because he preached forgiveness, while Christ preached eternal torment for
|
|
the 'inattentive' (pp175-6)
|
|
- Chp 17
|
|
- Religion is the only thing sustaining anti-Semitism
|
|
- Secular humanist political systems can take accountability, respond to
|
|
criticism and improve over time, while religious systems exempt themselves
|
|
from legitimate criticism, stifling progress
|
|
- The only alternative to totalitarianism is pluralism, which is inherently
|
|
secular
|
|
- Chp 18
|
|
- Secular humanism has been a powerful positive force throughout history in
|
|
face of oppression by religion, as proved by example:
|
|
- Socrates proved that conscience is innate, and that a great way to mock
|
|
dogma is with satire which pretends to accept that dogma
|
|
- Lucretius, Democritus and Epicurus had better explanations for the way the
|
|
world worked than religion (which is why their work was suppressed in
|
|
Christian Europe and nearly lost forever as a result). Once rediscovered,
|
|
their ideas kick-started the Scientific Revolution in Europe
|
|
- Spinoza's deistic ideas had a huge influence despite Jews collaborating
|
|
with their Christian oppressors to try and ban his writing out of
|
|
existence
|
|
- Boyle and Voltaire may have been closet atheists, agnostics or deists
|
|
- Kant 'overthrew' the cosmological and ontological arguments for the
|
|
existence of God, and proved (by means of the Categorical Imperative) that
|
|
human decency does not require any theological assumptions
|
|
- Let's chuck some more names in the ring: Gibbon, Hume, Paine, Franklin,
|
|
Darwin, Einstein
|
|
- Jews were once doubly ghettoed: on the outside by oppressive Christians,
|
|
and on the inside by oppressive self-racialisation. Secular humanism freed
|
|
Jews from both these ghettoes, which in turn led to an outpouring of
|
|
secular Jewish brilliance
|
|
- Ancient Jews were on the road to a quasi-secular Hellenism, before that
|
|
was ruined forever by the tyrannical and fanatical Judas Maccabeus, with
|
|
disastrous consequences for the history of Western civilisation. The
|
|
Abrahamic religions we know today were not inevitable, and it is possible
|
|
to imagine what Western history would have been like without it
|
|
- Chp 19
|
|
- Secular humanism is a better alternative to religion, because:
|
|
- Religion requires clinging to immovable dogma and being unwilling to
|
|
change your mind
|
|
- Seeking truth requires being willing to change your mind
|
|
- Secular humanism is therefore on the side of seeking truth, and religion
|
|
is on the side of wilful ignorance
|
|
- Secular humanism is on the side of progress, because it is what enables the
|
|
expansion of scientific knowledge and the development of new technology
|
|
|
|
## The odds and ends
|
|
|
|
- Chp 1: an introduction to the themes of the book with little substantial
|
|
- Chp 3: titled 'A Short Digression on the Pig', it does what it says on the tin
|
|
- Chp 12: titled 'A Coda: How Religions End', it does what it says on the tin
|
|
- Chp 14: contrary to the hopes of some Westerners disillusioned with organised
|
|
Western religion, Eastern religions like Buddhism, Hinduism and Taoism are not
|
|
a solution to the problems of religion
|
|
|
|
I would be interested to try writing apologetic and/or evangelistic responses to
|
|
these ideas. But it's not a priority for me right now. Anyway, if I ever want to
|
|
come back to it, I'll probably come back to these spark notes to give me a head
|
|
start.
|