From c179adccb27badc2055cefd80a8863ffb0d1b478 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joe Carstairs <me@joeac.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 18:25:28 +0100
Subject: replace <hr> with <hr/>

---
 common/longlog/2024-07-16.gmi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'common/longlog')

diff --git a/common/longlog/2024-07-16.gmi b/common/longlog/2024-07-16.gmi
index 4425d96..447625a 100644
--- a/common/longlog/2024-07-16.gmi
+++ b/common/longlog/2024-07-16.gmi
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ Some authors have managed to recognise the ambiguity of the term. Both King et a
 
 So it seems that although many academics have treated the term ‘hallucination’ as jargon, in actual fact, there is no widely agreed specific meaning of the word.
 
-<hr>
+<hr />
 
 I will slide in here with a quick side note. While some authors treated ‘hallucination’ as jargon for unfaithfulness or unfactuality, other authors contemporaneously managed to talk about these topics without using the word ‘hallucination’ at all. Here are some examples:
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3